My Endorsement of President Donald Trump for Re-Election - Part 3, Immigration (cont...The New Slavery of Wall Street)

What if there was a way for the mega-corporations to further stampede on the competition and assert their dominance by exploiting cheap labor? Would people support it? Would people cry foul and declare it slavery? Or would the fools just let it happen right underneath our noses? What if I said they already have been letting it happen right underneath our noses?

A common theme for the proponents of unrestricted free immigration seems to be that immigrants perform labor that Americans tend not to want to perform. Huh?!? They pick cotton, work on farms, pick the strawberries, etc. And they do it for less pay! Well that may be all well and true but...this is the exact same thing that the U.S. abolished in the 1860's! It is true, there is a new form of slavery that the Wall Street execs love. Certainly, David Koch loves it! If cheap labor is implemented, we drive costs down, save money, and food gets to people at a lower price. Hence, why he stuffs the money into the corporate shills in the Republican party. Those same corporate shills that are backing Biden.

Indeed, this is just a new form of slave importation. You shovel in the people who are in Wall Street's eyes just products for labor, you put them to work, and Wall Street saves money while making more money. Those who follow the rules are crushed while Wall Street wallows in the glory. David Koch gets to call it "libertarian-conservatism" as his allies at the CATO Institute spread article after article defending the big corporations and the unrestricted free migration process. Because these undocumented immigrants possess no social security, Wall Street can safely "un-person" them at will before they're caught, pay lower rates than the minimum wage, and nobody knows they're being scammed because they haven't learned what the minimum wage rate is.

It's true, the primary enemy in all of this is going to be fixed wage rates, fixed pricing, etc. But it was Wall Street's cartels that established these rules. Small businesses have historically been the ones most crushed by the cartels and the monopolistic rule impositions, not a single small business has ever been sustained by making Target or Walmart play by the rules. This all started with railroads, then it shifted gradually over to banks. Now we're seeing it happen all over Wall Street. So the usage of unrestricted free immigration is something that these major corporations really love. The fast food chains, the growers, the supermarkets, the elite celebrities who are looking for housekeepers, etc. As soon as there's cheap labor, they take it in and rake it in.

There are two solutions to this...

1. Enforce the rules equally - but Wall Street has the money and the means to pay the punishments, small businesses don't.

2. End the importation of slaves.

It's obvious enough that the call to end fixed wages, especially for entry-level jobs, would go a long way as well. But even still, ending the importation of slaves is a must for collective bargaining and guilds to retake the scenes again. Undermine the sources that Wall Street has and stop giving in to the shills for Wall Street.

Don't think for a minute that these Wall Street shills who fawn over Biden's "humanitarian justice" on immigration are somehow past racism. These are the people who attacked our immigrant First Lady for having bad English. These are the same people who have scammed undocumented immigrants out of hard-earned money. These are the despicable slaveholders. Corporate shills like Biden would continue the never-ending slave trade that continues underneath the masked name of "human rights".

*As I covered most of my positions on immigration in the Part 2, I don't intend to make this one too long. Just to hammer in the point of which side Wall Street is on.

My Endorsement of President Donald Trump for Re-Election - Part 2, Immigration

"As conditions are today, the Americas and Australia in admitting German, Italian, and Japanese immigrants would merely open their doors to the vanguard of hostile armies." -Ludwig von Mises, Human Action, 821

"[Sen. Jeff Flake] is weak on borders and weak on trade!" -Pres. Donald Trump

A common mistake is to turn the topic of immigration into a social justice issue that serves the immigrant who is the one entering into the country and failing to understand the socioeconomic impact on those already living inside a state. Hence, the charge of "racism" is thrown out at regularity by those who demand open borders. And while Christian, as well as liberal-conservative, values are rooted in the freedom to emigrate, this does not guarantee the freedom to immigrate. One can scream, "JESUS WAS A REFUGEE!!!" at the top of their lungs all they want. That does not indicate the Christian social teaching has ever accepted immigration on demand. St. Louis IX, the great Catholic monarch of France, gave an ultimatum to the Jews in his land stating "let Jews give up usury or go from my land". It is simply common sense that immigration has as its ultimate goal "integration, not disintegration or segregation. The immigrant should not only desire to assume the benefits but the responsibilities of joining a nation." (The American TFP, "What Does Saint Thomas Say About Immigration?)

The CATO institute has become so overtly open borders that it has even decided that the warning that Ludwig von Mises gave in the full textbook for Austrian liberalism, Human Action, has all of a sudden become overridden. Let me again state, no one is against emigration nor is any one against immigration! However, immigration, the entrance of an immigrant into a nation is not a matter of social justice for the migrant but also carries a social impact for the country as well.

Hans-Hermann Hoppe has noted that the "unconditional free immigration must be regarded as a prescription for societal suicide" (Democracy: The God That Failed, 160). Such is the current position of the Biden camp which the former Sen. Jeff Flake sees as "more conservative than Trump". But Biden has indicated he is more than in favor of providing healthcare to all migrants. This would lead to an obvious influx in migration from third-world countries that would end up overwhelming our healthcare system. Hence, why Biden is appropriately, "A-Biden, whose name in Greek is Apollyon". But Hoppe indicates that even conditional free immigration which is the kind that the CATO institute promotes is detrimental to society though not in the most overt matter!

"Free trade and markets mean that private property owners may receive or send goods from and to other owners without government interference. The government stays inactive vis-à-vis the process of foreign and domestic trade ... [t]he government's sole function is that of maintaining the very trading-process by protecting citizen and domestic property. ... Accordingly, population movements, unlike product shipments, are not per se mutually beneficial events, because they are not always--necessarily and invariably--the result of an agreement between a specific receiver and sender. ... In this case, immigrants are foreign invaders and immigration represents an act of invasion." (ibid, 161)

If you want to see a live example of some of the invasion that we might be talking about, look no further than California, the home of Sen. Kamala Harris. Overrun it with migrants and give them free leeway and now they have moved into the streets, onto the doorsteps of small businesses, even into major grocery chain retailers. The homeless situation is skyrocketing through the roof as migrants continue to fluctuate in. Some of them are denizens of California who have been forced out of work in favor of Wall Street's cheaper preference to cheat those without social security, and others are migrants that have moved in. Unrestricted immigration becomes a literal invasion because "even life on and off the public streets and parks in the United States and Switzerland is comfortable as compared to 'real' life in many other areas of the world" (162).

As Rothbard himself put it, "Get Rid of the Bums" ("A Strategy for the Right, in The Irrepressible Rothbard, 41). Not only does unrestricted immigration benefit Wall Street by providing them with an infinite amount of cheap labor, it serves to detriment small businesses who will be crushed by skyrocketing homeless numbers that occur as a result of the economic poverty that ensues, it terrorizes personal and private property as a result. Unrestricted free immigration is a bane for society.

Trump is not against immigration. He is fully in favor of immigration and welcoming immigrants who love and want to be benefactors toward American discourse and civil life. Many immigrants want to be as well. Trump's model for immigration matches that of the most sensible immigration model that preserves the private property for its citizens, does not turn on foreigners, and would benefit all Americans by allowing Americans to love and value a society where freedom of life, liberty, and property is guaranteed.

The Flake immigration plan benefits Wall Street execs who can profit on the harm caused by cheap labor to small businesses while surviving harm done to their own because they already have established business models. The Biden plan further detriments and is Hoppe's textbook definition of a prescription for societal suicide. Biden and Flake's models for immigration are nonsense and would ruin America while a tiny minority of Wall Street execs benefit. Once again, this proves that Sen. Jeff Flake and Joe Biden are nothing more than shills for Wall Street and corporate America.

Links

1. https://www.tfp.org/what-does-saint-thomas-say-about-immigration/

My Endorsement of President Donald Trump for Re-Election - Part 1, Trade

I had been hesitant to officially proffer my full support of Donald Trump before but as I see the political winds spiral downwards and compare and contrast the Democratic National Convention with the Republican National Convention, I can fully state that it will be easier to vote Trump in 2020 than it was in 2016. Like I've said before, there are a lot of reasons not to back him but the case for him is too overwhelming. The question should realistically be asked first and foremost is this--would a Libertarian President really be able to stop Congressional budget bills? Probably not as effectively as Trump has been able to stop them. As long as Congress is taken over by irresponsible budget-makers, big government spending will continue. Therefore, I am fully retracting my initial endorsement of Jo Jorgensen.

Now, to begin the full-fledged endorsement. The first policy I will look at is trade policy. The former Sen. Jeff Flake has lately been attempting to smear Donald Trump on his "non-conservative" trade policies. Let's put this bluntly, conservatism needs to reject Sen. Jeff Flake's trade policies. Conservatism in America has been tainted by its staunchest enemies as being more invested in Wall Street than it has in those who are most vulnerable, especially the poor and the economically disadvantaged. The last thing we need is to give further into this delusion by shaking our heads with Sen. Jeff Flake that this is what conservatism ought to be and look like. Conservatism has nothing to do with the Wall Street-backing trade policies of the former Senator.

Sen. Jeff Flake has condemned Donald Trump on at least three different accounts of the President's trade policies and I will rebut all of them and show what a shill for Wall Street Joe Biden is. The Trash Pacific Partnership (TPP for short) is a trade deal that served to back the Wall Street gang and rigged the economy against the lower-class small businesses. The TPP's intent is to

further transfer the negotiation and implementation of trade policy into the hands of a small number of global regulators and bureaucrats, while further reducing the prerogatives of Congress and state legislators in the US. Indeed, citizens of all twelve member nations of the TPP will see trade policy become more remote and unknowable thanks to the TPP. And, since trade is but one small part of the agreement, we can expect a further shift toward opaque and authoritarian global decision making on everything from environmental policy to the internet to immigration. (Mises.org, We Need Actual Free Trade, Not the TPP)

The TPP is so full revolting to the concept of free trade and so monstrous a demon to small businesses that even former Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton opposed entrance into the TPP. Then came Trump who actually pulled us out of the TPP. The purpose of such trade goals is for the government to regulate the trade and control the economy to determine winners and losers. This is good for Wall Street. This is good for the Wall Street donors that still shovel money to Flake to speak out against the President and no doubt good for Biden who will be twice the Wall Street shill as Obama, but it isn't good for small businesses, nor is it good for a free and FAIR economy.

Similarly, Flake has also attacked the President on his NAFTA policies. NAFTA was championed by the Clintons in the 1990s as well as several Wall Street backed Republicans including George H. W. Bush who negotiated the deal for NAFTA before it was signed by Bill Clinton. But NAFTA has been detrimental to the American auto industry (PRI's The World, "From NAFTA to TPP, Hillary Clinton's position is complicated, and evolving"). The government regulation and control of the economy has killed jobs, moved work to other places, and has made turned economics into a series of trade wars. These are not good deals. While certainly Sanders' supporters oppose these and that might be sufficient to say that these are "fiscally conservative" deals, that is primarily because "fiscally conservative" has been hijacked by the globalist Wall Street beneficiary.

Let's not even get started with the Paris Climate Accord (or, rather, the Paris Climate Discord). The Paris Climate Discord set it's aim out to throw money into the global climate change crisis to lower the world's temperatures. Sure, there might be need for green energy as an alternative to usage of fossil fuels but the climate change doomsday-sayers have officially gone into a full-blown money-laundering cult. If the solution is to "throw money into policies that claim to lower the economy" then it's not a solution, it's abuse. Do you go up to someone and steal their money to distribute it to charity? No? Why not? Because it's theft! The climate change crisis movement has become a money-laundering, thieving cult that has targeted countries like India and has left them in third world chaos. Apart from that, most of the money from the Paris Climate Discord was going to China, the world's leading polluter. If this is the solution to combating global warming, then it must be a hoax invented by the Chinese! I say that tongue and cheek, but seriously, this smacks of a money scam, not an actual accord! Hence, we call it the Paris Climate Discord. Good for Wall Street, bad for small business, manufacturing, and engineering jobs.

Let's now turn to tariffs. Obviously, Trump has a major issue when it comes to tariffs and the most aggressive liberal-conservatives are going to try and nail him here. "We need free and fair trade!" Exactly. The problem is, we don't live in a free and fair world. If the tariffs punish bad actors, tariffs can be tolerated. Thus far, Trump has limited his tariffs against China. He has threatened Mexico and Canada but has never formally gone through with them and I don't expect he will. As long as they are only directed at China with respect to its human rights violations, this can be tolerated until China ends slavery.

Trump's trade policy has been far from perfect but it is better than the Wall Street shill Joe Biden. Biden would invest in defending failed policies like NAFTA which have victimized engineering and manufacturing jobs in the U.S. and have sent them to Mexico. This might be good for Wall Street but absolutely no one in the rust belt. Biden would further keep laundering tax-payer money to China in the name of fighting global warming while China uses that money for God knows what including even pumping out more pollution. Biden would turn a blind eye onto China's grotesque human rights violations. Wall Street would love it. They would end up getting cheap labor, they could form monopolies, and the globalist super-powers would continue as they did before Trump--with the little guys losing and the big boys in Wall Street becoming the beneficiaries of the New World Order. Sen. Flake's characterization of Biden as "more conservative on trade than Trump" is simply nothing more than a highlight of how much a shill for Wall Street Biden is.

End Part 1.

Articles referenced

1. https://mises.org/library/we-need-actual-free-trade-not-tpp

2. https://www.pri.org/stories/2016-07-28/hillary-clinton-s-stand-nafta-and-tpp-it-s-complicated-and-evolving

The intrusion of Malthusian economics into the Democratic Party

The "how" are they going to pay for these welfare programs they propose is no longer relevant. The Democratic Party has now since worked out the bug in this philosophical dilemma. They won't even need to pay for welfare! Indeed, the Democratic Party has fully subsumed the death-cult that Brian Niemeier has been discussing for years now. It is a cult given totally over to the worship of the demonic institutions that celebrate death, Satan, famine, war, violence, fornication, every single vice. All of a sudden, the problem of economic populists on the Left embracing Marxism have become tame. Of course, the schools which modern day Marxism have been broken down into have almost even watered down its overt anti-religious sentiment that it would once bore. Bernie Sanders in 2016 seems almost frail in comparison to what the Democratic Party started to become under the neo-con migration back toward the Party when Hillary Clinton took the realms. It's all but fully gone over to the hands of death now.

But even as Marxist anti-Christians begin to dominate the Democratic Party, still, the worst among us are those who feign the most economically "right wing" stances because, well, at least they're not socialists! Indeed, the Keynesians have taken a radically anti-social death-cult bend as they drift back toward the Democratic Party from which they came in order to "get rid of Trump". I mentioned this earlier in my piece on how Joe Biden and Kamala Harris aren't radical leftists, they're much worse. There is a new economic principle in the Democratic Party that has not been discussed by either the media or the neo-cons that have hijacked the #MAGA movement. And with good reason. If people started talking about it, the Democratic Party might as well go ahead and dig its own grave and hand over the election once again.

This economic doctrine is the doctrine of Thomas Robert Malthus. For Malthus, the issues in this world of poverty and famine were explained by the increasing rise in human population. He proposed that crime, disease, war, pestilence, and  vice are necessary checks on the human population which is the gravest hindrance to an economically prosperous society. Even regulation of reproduction is necessary to prevent people from giving birth to more children than they can support. Today's Democratic Party has been using every single one of these mechanisms to keep the population in check. It's almost as if China's population control mechanisms have sifted into their usage. They use COVID-19 to lock people in doors. They unleash criminals back into society in order to heighten the murder rate in our inner cities. They endorse every single sexual vice and sexual fornication, mandate that people provide contraceptives for one another as a matter of "altruism". Now, the neo-cons have found a nesting home to advance the death-cult agenda one notch further up. The neo-cons have found their new champion in Joe Biden. Joseph II of the House of Biden has become their Dark Lord of Chaos to usher in the reign of terror.

It used to be that the Democratic Party was a party that had flaws and flawed characters. Critical race theory has become a new guise for them to advance the death-cult. They have made a mockery of every single Christian social teaching and our Christian leaders won't even condemn them because they have been duped into thinking that their fight is against racism. But the end goal is obviously more sinister. Every Republican that has endorsed Biden so far has had some background in the neo-con death-cult or the reproductive restrictions death-cult. I am not even shocked any more to find this. Former Rep. Charlie Dent has received high ratings from population control advocacy groups including a 100% rating from Population Action International. That was the realization for me that Malthus was behind the economic movement for the Democratic Party.

So how are they going to pay for these social programs they propose? Don't be ridiculous! They're expanding reproductive restrictions, engaging in endless wars, promoting homosexuality and transgender euphorism, releasing violent criminals back into the streets all before our very eyes! How they are going to pay for these social programs is irrelevant when they won't even have to pay for them! Don't listen to those liars stating that this is between capitalist and Marxist economics. Biden is capitalist to the core. He won't let Marxists up-stage him as he runs the Presidency. One would have to be a fool to think not. Not with his Vice President Kamala Harris being funded by Wall Street. No, this is a fight against Malthusian economics. It is a fight against the extermination of the human population.

This has trivially nothing to do with pitting socialists against capitalists. This is a full-blown death-cult that has its roots in the Malthusian economic system of the lat 18th century. It should be warned for people to ignore the news cycle for the duration and heed against the evils of Malthus's An Essay On the Principle of Population. The Democratic Party doesn't carry a principled economic philosophy. They carry an extermination philosophy that they hope will lead to economic prosperity. That is why they have adopted every single pro-death policy in the book. Crime, war, abortion, sterilization, pestilence, etc. These are the checks to keep the human population in check, indoors, dependent on government services until the population is further shrunk down to size. Think this is a conspiracy? Yet it is happening right in front of our eyes and the neo-cons continue to embed the final element of war into the mix!

Monarchism is a political icon of the Trinity

In terms of the divine economy, the political philosophy that most directly and accurately reflects the Triune God is monarchy. Monarchy is the organic society of the Triune nature. The error of oligarchy is that it posits a multitude of divnities that operate and run society. The error of democracy is that it posits man as competing against his fellow man for positions of power in society. Monarchy holds both the natural hierarchy to prevent and prohibit competition between men and it reflects a Triune nature in society between the monarch, the people, and the country.

Erik Ritter von Kuehnelt-Leddihn states that "[d]ue to its inherent patriarchalism, monarchy fits organically into the ecclesiastic and familistic pattern of a Christian society" (Liberty or Equality, 155). The theology of the procession of the Son and the Holy Spirit in the Cappadocian fathers only further enunciates as to how the Trinity is far more modeled in a monarchial society than in a democratic and oligarchical society. St. Basil writes,

For we do not count by way of addition, gradually making increase from unity to multitude, and saying one, two, and three — nor yet first, second, and third. For I, God, am the first, and I am the last. (Isaiah 44:6) And hitherto we have never, even at the present time, heard of a second God. Worshipping as we do God of God, we both confess the distinction of the Persons, and at the same time abide by the Monarchy. We do not fritter away the theology in a divided plurality, because one Form, so to say, united in the invariableness of the Godhead, is beheld in God the Father, and in God the Only begotten. For the Son is in the Father and the Father in the Son; since such as is the latter, such is the former, and such as is the former, such is the latter; and herein is the Unity. (De Spiritu Sanctu, 18.45)

The monarchy is the one God. Taken into a political symbolism, the monarchy is the one state. The one state thus consists of the country, the people, and the king. "Thus the way of the knowledge of God lies from One Spirit through the One Son to the One Father, and conversely the natural Goodness and the inherent Holiness and the royal Dignity extend from the Father through the Only-begotten to the Spirit. Thus there is both acknowledgment of the hypostases and the true dogma of the Monarchy is not lost." (18.46) The political state, in a similar matter, lies from one country through the one people to the one king. Thus, there is spoken of being one kingdom and not a multitude of kingdoms. And though an empire be made up of multiple kingdoms, it is also one empire. St. Gregory Nazianzen writes,

Look at these facts:—Christ is born; the Spirit is His Forerunner. He is baptized; the Spirit bears witness. He is tempted; the Spirit leads Him up. He works miracles; the Spirit accompanies them. He ascends; the Spirit takes His place. What great things are there in the idea of God which are not in His power? What titles which belong to God are not applied to Him, except only Unbegotten and Begotten? For it was needful that the distinctive properties of the Father and the Son should remain peculiar to Them, lest there should be confusion in the Godhead Which brings all things, even disorder itself, into due arrangement and good order. Indeed I tremble when I think of the abundance of the titles, and how many Names they outrage who fall foul of the Spirit. (Orations, 31.29)

The similar thought is brought up again. The country proclaims the people of the kingdom and the people of the kingdom have the duty to proclaim the kingdom. Once again, the Triune procession sets the model for a monarchy. To cap it all off, St. Gregory even affirms that it is a monarchy that is held in honor.

The three most ancient opinions concerning God are Anarchia, Polyarchia, and Monarchia. The first two are the sport of the children of Hellas, and may they continue to be so. For Anarchy is a thing without order; and the Rule of Many is factious, and thus anarchical, and thus disorderly. For both these tend to the same thing, namely disorder; and this to dissolution, for disorder is the first step to dissolution. But Monarchy is that which we hold in honour. (29.2)

It is further to be emphasized in the writings of St. Gregory of Nyssa that the members of the Trinity are differentiated by cause. 

If, however, any one cavils at our argument, on the ground that by not admitting the difference of nature it leads to a mixture and confusion of the Persons, we shall make to such a charge this answer — that while we confess the invariable character of the nature, we do not deny the difference in respect of cause, and that which is caused, by which alone we apprehend that one Person is distinguished from another — by our belief, that is, that one is the Cause, and another is of the Cause; and again in that which is of the Cause we recognize another distinction. For one is directly from the first Cause, and another by that which is directly from the first Cause; so that the attribute of being Only-begotten abides without doubt in the Son, and the interposition of the Son, while it guards His attribute of being Only-begotten, does not shut out the Spirit from His relation by way of nature to the Father. (On Not Three Gods)

Yes, the country differs from the people in that the country is the earth that the people cultivate. The people differ from the king in that the king presides in a rulership of love over the people. These are the main differences. The king is the Cause in this sense, of the country and the people, and the people share a relationship to cultivate the land. Thus, the Spirit proceeds from the Father through the Son (I won't go into filoque debates here!). The country proceeds from the king through the people. The main error with oligarchy is that it displaces the one monarch with a multitude of deities to preside over the land, thus dividing it. The problem with democracy is that it reduces people to operating in a competitive spirit for control over one another. But following the Cappdocian fathers and the theology of the Cappadocian fathers, I argue that a monarchial society provides a far more accurate political icon of the Trinity. 

The Dormition of the Theotokos

St. Maximus the Confessor draws many parallels between the Dormition of the Theotokos and other events in the life of the Ever-Virgin in his hagiographical The Life of the Virgin. It is first proclaimed to her by the Archangel Gabriel of her Dormition (ch.8, 103). As was too her Annnciation. This was so that she may be joined to our Lord in his death and resurrection. Our Lady commanded the Apostles, "Rejoice, O blessed children, and do not make my Dormition a cause of grief, but be full of the greatest joy, for I am going to my eternal joy, and may the grace and mercy of the Lord be with you always." (105) As with Christ's own death and resurrection, it is on the third day that the Apostle Thomas shows up and beseeches the other Apostles to open the tomb in order to receive one last blessing from the Theotokos (117). As the tomb was opened, there was found no body for the Ever-Virgin had been assumed. As it is with the Annunciation, so it was with the Dormition. The Archangel Gabriel proclaimed both. The Theotokos prepared the Apostles for her death as our Lord also prepared his Apostles for his own death and betrayal. It was on the third day that the tomb was pushed open for one last blessing. As it was with our own Lord. It was the Apostle Thomas who by his doubt confirmed the bodily resurrection of our Lord, who also confirmed the bodily assumption of our Lady by his tardiness (118).

Biden and Harris aren't radical leftists...but they are dangerous criminals

Let me begin by discussing two meanings of the term conservative. The first meaning is to refer to someone as conservative who generally supports the status quo; that is, a person who wants to conserve whatever laws, rules, regulations, moral and behavioral codes happen to exist at any given point in time.

Because different laws, rules, and political institutions are in place at different times and/or different locations, what a conservative supports depends on ad changes with place and time. To be a conservative means nothing specific except to like the existing order, whatever that may be.

The first meaning can be discarded, then. The term conservative must have a different meaning. What it means, and possibly only can mean, is this: Conservative refers to someone who believes in the existence of a natural order, a natural state of affairs which corresponds to the nature of things: of nature and man. ... Conservatives..., if they stand for anything, stand for and want to preserve the family and the social hierarchies and layers of material as well as spiritual-intellectual authority based on and growing out of family bonds and kinship relations. (Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Democracy: The God That Failed, 187-188)

I start with this lengthy quote from the 10th chapter of Hoppe's work Democracy: The God That Failed, because already, the death-cult members of "Republicans for Joe Biden" and the Lincoln Project are trying to frame the Biden/Harris ticket (her name means horrible in Finnish, let's change that to the Biden/Horrible ticket from here on out) as somehow a "conservative" ticket and not the demonic ticket that it is. For conservatives who don't know what the term actually refers to, that narrative is craftily designed to persuade them to the Biden/Horrible ticket. And yet Biden/Horrible are only conservatives in the meaningless first sense of the word. But terms such as "racism" are already relegated to meaninglessness so did we actually expect an intellectually engaging definition of the term from such mindless, brain-dead, zombies? We shouldn't have.

But that said, don't get confused. Biden/Horrible shouldn't be thought of as radical leftists either. In fact, such misleading terminology the other way may actually persuade some radical leftist visionaries to vote for the Biden/Horrible ticket! To be a leftist is to be a fanatic in favor of populist gutting of the corporate hierarchies and excel to income equality. Biden/Horrible are funded and assisted by Big Tech, Wall Street, the Banks, Big Pharma, you name it! They have no intention of promoting a populist left-wing government. They're solidly in favor of preserving the corruption that the Clinton-Bush-Obama administrations sewed. They're no allies of the left at all. And the left knew that back in 2018 and they still affirmed back in 2019 and they divided amongst themselves between Warren and Sanders and are now paying the price for their inner discord with the Biden/Horrible ticket.

To say that Biden/Horrible are dangerous criminals is not a term used lightly. The Democrats talked of Russian collusion for years immediately following Trump's election win in 2016. The story, as Trump called it, was a hoax. The Democrats have actually never had a problem with Trump's lies though they act like they do. They hate it more when he tells the truth. Such as the caravan of illegal migrants before the 2018 midterms, that Russian collusion was a hoax, that there is violence being done in Portland, OR, etc. They cried that Trump was obstructing justice by declaring the story a hoax. By firing James Comey whom they had forgotten they hated. But Biden bragged about how he got the Ukrainian lawyer off his son's tail. Naturally, the media, realizing the story would not help their narrative, began making up excuses.

But their corruption doesn't end there. In 2008, the Bush/Cheney administration began a habit of war crimes that I have jestingly referred to as "wedding crashing". The Haska Meyna wedding airstrike was carried out in July 6, 2008. The Wech Baghtu wedding party was bombed November 3, 2008. Both of these killed innocent civilians. Nobody seemed to dare challenge Bush on it at the time. Inspired by this demonic activity of the Bush administration, the Obama/Biden administration duplicated the events in Yemen in 2015. That was a U.S. backed Saudi-led coalition that carried out that raid and it received universal condemnation from the U.N. and yet no one was punished for it, proving the U.N. to be useless in promoting peace throughout the world. Don't forget the wedding bombed in 2013 either. The pattern was even more frequent than the examples I have given here as it started in 2008 but if there is anything that will be "conservative" in the Biden/Horrible administration, you can guarantee it will be this.

Horrible herself has a streak of criminally violating the Constitutional rights of people for political expedience. There was an ongoing joke in the Soviet Union that you had free speech, you'd just be thrown in jail if you exercised it. Horrible is no exception to the Soviet philosophy. In 2015, David Daleiden released videos from a Planned Parenthood that exposed their human sacrifice philosophy. Daleiden was pursued and probed by the then Atty. Gen. of California, Horrible. Planned Parenthood is funded by tax-payer money. This makes it public property. It is open for the press to freely report on it. For Horrible, freedom of the press doesn't apply to people who criticize the death-cult. It only applies to the zombified worshipers of the death-cult. Death is what the neo-cons have always worshiped.

It's really not shocking at all to see the Republicans who support the Biden/Horrible ticket. These Republicans are the Wall Street invested ilk, the neo-con warmongerers, the kind of Republicans that make people of common sensibility want to not walk but run away in terror from the GOP. I couldn't care any less for whatever such-and-such Republican says. I'm not even a Republican so why should I care if you're a Republican voter for Biden? I'm politically unaffiliated for a reason. It's the McCain-style Republicans that want to see Biden elected. The Bush-style Republicans. The Graham-style Republicans. The Romney-style Republicans. The con artists and the warmongerers want to oust a man under the banner that he's a con artist. Ha ha! Too funny. There is really no principled wit that these neo-cons have left in them. They're sold out in worship of their demonic leaders that cry out for blood. They think Trump leads a death-cult because he couldn't contain a virus that has a survivability rate of 99.7% (three times that of the flu) without a vaccine. And yet they'll adore Gov. Cuomo's response in blaming God and Mother Nature for the people he deliberately infected with the virus in nursing homes knowing full well it would kill them. Well, at least he investigate himself so he didn't obstruct justice! 

Biden/Horrible aren't radical leftists. They have no intentions of carrying out the economic populist vision of Warren and Sanders. Biden/Horrible are flagrant neo-cons assisted by the neo-con establishment. The neo-con establishment doesn't know any bounds when it comes to supporting the mass devastation of the human race. The neo-con principles are Malthusian in philosophy. Humans are the problem and the main threat to the Earth. To preserve the Earth, humans must be exterminated at all costs. Bringing about devastation and destruction in the Middle East was just the first straw for the neo-con establishment. Economic populism isn't the enemy of Western values. Economic populism isn't the enemy of Christianity. The true enemy of Christianity and Traditionalism is the neo-con establishment that infiltrates Christianity and Traditionalism from the inside pretending to be allies. But they are the enemies. Neo-cons are the true enemies of Western values. Biden/Horrible are thoroughly bred in this duplicitous pseudo-conservative movement. They aren't radical leftists. They're dangerous criminals and they must be stopped at all costs.

True facts about COVID-19

We don't know too much exactly about this but let's debunk some of the obvious myths by stating what we know to be true.

Wearing a mask won't stop the spread indoors. No, seriously, it won't. The virus's spread depends on airborne circulation. This means that no matter how much you dampen the moisture particles' spread with a mask or other facial covering, there will be particles to circulate around.

We're not all going to die from it! Most of us won't. In fact, the death rate is currently estimated to be 0.3%. That's still three times higher than seasonal flu but it also is not terrible.

Trump isn't killing us with the virus! No, seriously, I've come across death cult members trying to tell me that Trump is to blame for the COVID-19 deaths as if he actually spread the disease. The Lincoln Project is really demented in trying to pin the blame on Trump here. Early on, he was following the advice of his "experts" who were telling him not to lockdown, not to close borders, not to think this disease was something of concern. He listened to them. He would have been vilified if he hadn't listened to his experts then! No one can actually be held responsible unless they actually directly caused it. So unless there is sufficient proof that the virus is a biological weapon, we probably shouldn't be rushing to sue China over it either. (I do maintain that it leaked from a lab but that is different than stating it is a biological weapon.) Further, Trump isn't killing our economy. In fact, he was the only one who warned that these lockdowns would produce an effect of killing our economy, increasing mental illness rates, and leaving people impoverished. He let the local leaders take care of most everything. And the local leaders that decided to open up again were all chastised by the press. What is it exactly they want? Less infections? Less deaths? People back to work? Or Trump gone. The people pinning the blame on Trump here aren't actually principled, they're pursuing political power.

A vaccine won't end up getting us back to work! This is true. Just to put it bluntly, as long as the media sees people getting infected with COVID-19, they're going to continue in this zombified state of demanding perpetual shutdowns. A vaccine won't do diddly, especially with the virus mutating.

We've lost containment of the virus! This is most important, really. And it shows also the contrast and comparison. Were the lockdowns worth it? They didn't contain anything. The disease spread. All they did was destroy our livelihoods, our church communities, and our relationships with our fellow human beings.

The virus doesn't play politics! Listen, whether you're out protesting police brutality, or gathered at a Trump rally, or actively pillaging and raping our inner cities, the virus is going to spread. That said, Americans have every right to protest lockdowns and they have every right to protest police brutality. But apparently, some governors played their totalitarian hands and said protesting lockdowns threatened public health. That was never criticized as totalitarian by the "Never-Trumpers" who said he was playing fascist by ordering barbarians to be rounded up and sent to prison (not peaceful protesters!).

COVID-19 is not the only cause of death! Okay, this one really gets to me. I've joked about it, I've satirized it, I've sarcastically jested about it. But seriously, ever since COVID-19 started all our public health officials have been dedicated to is mitigating COVID-19. They suggest people avoid the hospitals, they've closed our mental institutions, they've forbidden in-person psychiatric sessions, Governor Rot-Face in Virginia doesn't even have enough beds for his psychiatric wards! The more we act like COVID-19 is the only cause of death, the more our public officials will be responsible for non-COVID-19 deaths. It is reprehensible that we are acting this way. And they'll have a lot more blood than they can pin on Trump. Who's the death cult member now?

Finally, COVID-19 is not an excuse to play party politics. Whether you're Democrat, Indpendent, Green Party, Republican, or Libertarian, Monarchist, etc., we can all stand together against the nonsensical lockdowns of the government. And only if we do this can we expect lockdowns to end. I posted an apology on Facebook where I mentioned how the COVID-19 lockdowns have negatively affected my mental health. So many people flocked in support to like it that I know. People on various different ends of the political spectrum. Lockdowns are not a matter that are grounded in party politics. Rational people can see and understand how the disconnection is negatively affecting people. The question is really more of a matter of whether we choose to cower in fear of our totalitarian overlords or denounce them as naked in front of their faces!

The demonic end result of preaching toxic masculinity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHzO5BXwl3I

This is a disturbing story of a boy who was diagnosed with ODD without any examination. ODD produces a higher rate of testosterone than normal. Hence, to counter this, estrogen was prescribed to him to counter-act the estrogen. But there is actually no scientific proof of this. The lawyer explains everything about the case and the boy was forced to receive the estrogen while in juvenile detention.

The culture that proclaims masculinity is toxic is an infectious disease spreading throughout our nation and it's a pandemic in our nation that has been breaking out for the last four years if I remember accurately. It's worse than the COVID-19 disease that's been spreading because men are the backbone to culture. It's worsened by the delusional egalitarian "Christians" who contend that women are every way the same in equality as men since God created both in his image. There is a problem with that anthropological theology. God created man and woman in his image. The man alone is not complete without the woman and the woman alone is not complete without the man. Rather than embracing the wholly complementarian nature of anthropological theology that God has ordered, the egalitarian mind-set is determined and infected with a Satanic thought to destroy and impair the relationship between men and women. It is set to teach women that she can do all things without men. But the image of God is not complete with only one gender.

Our old Archimandrite called this modernistic attack on masculinity demonic. It is demonic. It is a direct attack on the holistic nature of the imago dei. It is anthropological iconoclasm. The barbaric mentality demands that men are a problem and the problem is their inherent masculine characteristics. The solution is that men must toss away their masculinity. But the image of God is masculine and feminine. If the only good qualities are feminine qualities then we worship not God but goddess. And goddess is a demonic succubus that inhabits the worst qualities of even men. Rather than praising the genuine nature of masculinity and the quality characteristics associated with masculinity, culture has waged war against masculinity and has declared an iconoclastic crusade against the image of God.

So it is not even surprising that such a horrific, cruel and unusual punishment would come into existence in our culture in such a time. Especially in a Satanically possessed state as California. The estrogen prescribed to the man was not a medical treatment, it was a pseudo-scientific theological attack on the young man's masculinity itself. It was designed to turn him into a female. Of course, biology cannot be denied. If one is born a man, they are a man. Culture may deny reality as much as it wants. It may insist women can become men and men can become women but culture is wrong. Women are women, men are men. Transgenderism is a psychological illness, it is not a praiseworthy life-choice. The attempt to "de-man" the young man is doomed to fail but it is clear to see that culture has not waged a war against "toxic" characteristics mistakenly associated with masculinity. Culture in fact, has declared masculinity itself to be toxic. The proponents of toxic masculinity are bowing down before the genderly euphoric Baphomet deity. The goat-whore with the breasts that looks better when a sword is run through its bowels. That one.

Culture has first started its experimentation to cleans us of masculinity. This is why our culture has become increasingly over-sensitive, unintelligent, weak, savage. For it is nobility, intellect, reason, strength, and resilience that are associated with masculinity. But those must be cleansed by our crippling American culture now. Those must be removed and vanquished. Why? Because the American ethos has determined that masculinity is toxic and toxic masculinity must be defeated. But it is not masculinity that must be defeated. It is the toxic response to the noble characteristics of masculinity that must be repudiated. That is the disease. No corona virus could ever come close to the disease that has spread into our culture that would label masculinity as toxic.